Skip to Main Content

The Monkey Wrench Gang by Edward Abbey

England is a tamed place.  Tidied, neatened, fenced and edged.  Not a bit of it that doesn’t seem to belong to someone, laid claim to, made use of or about to be exploited.  You’ll only find the “wild” those rare times you get up high enough or ride a bicycle far enough that the fences disappear, roads becomes dirt and you are beyond sight of houses, cars and even electricity pylons.  For Edward Abbey in The Monkey Wrench Gang, the wild land of America is a constant presence.

300,000 souls lay about them below, the kingdom of neon, electric gardens of babylonic splendour surrounded by the bleak, black, slovenly wilderness that would never shape up.  Where the lean and hungry coyote skulked, unwilling to extinct.                                                                                                           Edward Abbey

The book was published nearly four decades ago and was a best seller at the time.  The environmental movement was recognised, influential but had the intellectual and middle class reputation it still retains today.  This book is none of those things.  It is raw, masculine, funny and sometimes offensive to a modern pc reader.  Abbey’s characters understand

“We’re up against a mad machine.”

where we are locked into destructive, endless growth that no-one for all their good intentions can opt out of.  Their response is to fight back as Ned Ludd did, with what one character calls,

“The rebellion of the meek.”

Although in this case the meek kit themselves out with bolt cutters, monkey wrenches and boxes of dynamite.

The book focuses on the exploits of four characters: Doc, a physician with a sideline in burning down billboards and his young partner Bonnie Abbzug, Hayduke a 25 year old Vietnam veteran and Seldom Seen Smith a lapsed Mormon who takes groups on trips down the Colorado River rapids. They meet on one of these trips.   They three men talk together till late into the night and each recognises in the others the same desire to destroy the dams, bridges, roads, pylons and mines that are tearing apart the Arizona desert for the benefit of the power hungry towns.­  Since the first chapter is entitled “Aftermath”, you know from the outset of the book that it will end in a breathtaking, pyrotechnic and comic display of destruction.  The interest is in how and why the four gang members  to that point and just how much they are willing to risk and to endure to achieve their ends.

Basically it’s an adventure story with plenty of tension, baddies, chases, near escapes and a little tragedy. You watch the group take on planning assaults on road building vehicles and an unmanned train as they work up to the final tour de force.   Abbey conveys the daring and excitement of the action the gang take.  After the first successful attack, wrecking the huge earth moving vehicles  with sand and sugar syrup, I was egging them on to do more.  Somehow Abbey got me involved in the adrenaline rush and satisfaction of being hugely destructive.  Maybe he is playing out something deep inside us, that we would like to take vast and powerful actions in,

“Trying to get back to something we all lost a long time ago.”

There is more detail than you might expect  - the writer’s love of weapons and survival equipment comes over.  It is not something I would normally enjoy but in Abbey’s style and his passion makes it not just easy to read but necessary to the story.  Of course, there is a love story but the greatest expression of love in the book is for the desert itself.

And the wind blows, the dust clouds darken the desert blue, pale sand and red dust drift across the asphalt trails and tumbleweeds fill the arroyos.                                                                              Edward Abbey

There is a great deal of humour in the book, not least in the portrait of the gang constantly driving from place to place in the Colorado area, eating large steaks, tossing their beer cans out of the window and complaining that gasoline costs 55 cents a gallon.  If you don’t like highways, says Haydrake,

“litter the shit out of them.”

Much of the humour centres on Bonnie Abbzug  who is a woman who doesn’t take kindly to being left on the sidelines, or more usually, as lookout.  She is sharp and decisive, the one who keeps Doc “together” – he admits to being prone to “unravel” and takes on the dangerously  inquisitive Park Ranger.  Unlike the men she is the one who owns and uses a bike, lives in a geodesic dome and grows her own tomatoes.  She has kind “hippy” friends and has been known to meditate. In a way she is a symbol of another approach to the environment – one more congruent with Transition!  However late in the progress of the action she goes home and  after a few days has to admit to herself,

“I want some action!”

And she returns to the desert.

Abbey once said, “Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.”

Reading The Monkey Wrench Gang won’t give you any practical ideas for your Transition journey (I hope!) but it will do two things: entertain you with a strong story written in witty, pared down prose and inspire you with the sense of how heroic it is to protect the wild from the endless encroachments of those who consider the natural world to be simply a commodity.

Pictures: Bookjacket, Edward Abbey

Comments

Jo Homan's picture

yup, wanna read it now

Hopefully it will contribute to my thinking about the "bring-everyone-along-with-you V end-civilisation-sooner-rather-than-later" versions of change making. Are a few people, who feel they know best, morally justified in imposing change by destabilising and destroying the status quo, in spite of the many and inevitable unforeseen consequences? Or would such people save us from ourselves? Do we need shaking up? Or is the shaking up going to happen anyway?

I was chatting to my mum about this and we settled on the point that any kind of dogma is bad news because of its lack of flexibility and compassion. It's not a human-centred, more outcomes-focussed ... which ends up being another kind of 'power over'. And feeling that it's okay to blow up roads, or whatever, for the sake of the greater good is just naive and destructive.

Charlotte Du Cann's picture

Way to go

Way to go Caroline. Abbey is just about the best writer on the defence of the wild I know.  If you prefer non-fiction to fiction Desert Solitaire is terrific.

In response to the shaking up thing Jo. Most "civilised" people need that big time, and a dose of anarchy and in-your-face reality is good for us all. I don't think the nicey-nicey approach does anything but keep everyone asleep. And if someone came into your house, smashed it up, threw your children out of the window, wrecked the garden etc. I'm not sure flexibility and compassion would be the right response!

But maybe I lived in the desert in Arizona too long, and lost my English reserve among the red rocks!

Jo Homan's picture

it's the house smashing that I'm against

Some people might see that as "a dose of anarchy and in-your-face reality".  The idea that you know (or some other anarchist) what's "good for us" is what I'm arguing against. What gives you the right to decide what my dose of reality should be? I haven't read the book, but it says that the characters want "to destroy the dams, bridges, roads, pylons and mines". I'm certain that violently bringing an end to civilisation in this way will not help create the future world I want to live in.

Caroline Jackson's picture

Transition stories

Hope you get to read the book Jo - guaranteed to raise your blood pressure but a Book that engages us to anger is a valuable thing.  It's a story and for all our valuing of Transition stories we don 't yet have much of a literature for Transition in the 21st century. Personally I find those little "good news stories" with which we dutifully end our meetings lack the power to shape my imagination.  Abbey, however, is a writer I have to respect.  Even if you can't stomach his thinking (and he does consider the issues you raise, in his own way) you, as a writer yourself, will love his prose.

Charlotte Du Cann's picture

raging against the machine

The Monkey Wrench Gang inspired generations of environmental activists (specifically Earth First!) and in some ways its anti-machine rebellion originated with the Luddites who were engaged in a similar struggle. It is of course fiction, which means that the actions and the characters are imaginatively worked. So the story has the ability to jump the stats and go to the heart of the matter.

However you swing it, we are complicit in the workings of the Machine. It's a reality most people don't want to look at, and books like Abbey's engage our attention - well my attention! - and make those issues live and urgent things, rather than information we can easily dismiss. The bridges, mines dams etc are violent things we still do to the Earth (and its peoples) four decades later. That's not an argument, or anyone's personal reality, it's a fact. The job of the writer is to wake people up to facts. Sometimes you need shock tactics!